Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 7 3750H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 493 days older than Ryzen 7 3750H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen 7 3750H - 216 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3750H - 16 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |