Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2225 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 390 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
368
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
