Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 580 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$405.0 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 43% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$3.46 vs CA$6.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 1700 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
117
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$405
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.05/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |