Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2317 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 123% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1620 - 105 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
47
44%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |