Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 444 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 2700 - 429 vs 401 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$280.0 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.7 vs CA$2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
429
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
33%
Price, CA$
CA$899
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13802 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
401
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13803 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Matisse | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |