Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$93.19 vs CA$460.57
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$460.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77841 minutes ago
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |