Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$368.49 vs CA$574.75
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 5 2600X - 245 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$368.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
245
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$574.75
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
97.09576138147567%
Multi-Core
5263
70.60638583310974%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |