Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1417 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - CA$343.92 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
98.24561403508771%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$343.92
100%
Buy for CA$343.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1848 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350
98%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1845 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 88 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |