Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 79% better in Diablo IV than FX-8150 - 165 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$87.12 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Diablo IV than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.95 vs CA$1.76 per FPS
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.76/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$290
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11285 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
92
55%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |