Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$87.12 vs CA$223.52
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.52 vs CA$1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8150 - 207 vs 167 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.13/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$223.52
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$223.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |