Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14500 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - CA$87.12 vs CA$329.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-14500 - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 108% better in F1 23 than FX-8150 - 303 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
146
48%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
303
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$329
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i5-14500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |