Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 588 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 196 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$42.99 vs CA$89.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.23 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$89
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |