Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$180.0 vs CA$378.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 1500X - 260 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1500X - 20 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
254
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$378
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |