Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 620 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G6900 - 180 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$112.98 vs CA$129.53
- Up to 10% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$0.65 vs CA$0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$129.53
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$129.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
175
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |