Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300U outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300U is 1903 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300U - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |