Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3423 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Phenom X4 9550 - 137 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
19.982920580700256%
Multi-Core
712
9.444223371799973%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |