Buy on Amazon
CA$800
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3423 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Phenom X4 9550 - 128 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 32 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Phenom X4 9550
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Agena | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
