Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$111.14 vs CA$850.0
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-8320 - 267 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for CA$850 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |