Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 344 days older than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$83.46 vs CA$499.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3930K - CA$0.64 vs CA$3.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than FX-8300 - 137 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
94.8905109489051%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
17.534246575342465%
Price, CA$
CA$499.95
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |