Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$87.12 vs CA$488.98
- Up to 74% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$0.97 vs CA$3.73 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 46% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8150 - 131 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.73/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$488.98
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$488.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |