Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$87.12 vs CA$375.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$2.03 vs CA$6.7 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 56 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.7/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$375
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |