Buy on Amazon
CA$187.01
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$187.01 vs CA$850.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.99 vs CA$4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6300 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 20 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.47/FPS
22.14765100671141%
Price, CA$
CA$850
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$850 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
