Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2729 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Core i7-3770 - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$185.8 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-10900X - CA$1.09 vs CA$4.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.63/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$834
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
170
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$185.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |