Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1316 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - CA$59.57 vs CA$205.91
- Up to 67% better value when playing New World than Core i7-6800K - CA$0.61 vs CA$1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 13% better in New World than FX-6300 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.86/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$205.91
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$205.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |