Buy on Amazon
CA$187.01
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$187.01 vs CA$599.46
- Up to 65% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.2 vs CA$3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-6300 - 176 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
156
88.63636363636364%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.41/FPS
35.19061583577712%
Price, CA$
CA$599.46
31%
FPS Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for CA$599.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
