Buy on Amazon
CA$187.01
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$187.01 vs CA$890.53
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$0.82 vs CA$3.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-6300 - 239 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
229
95.81589958158996%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.73/FPS
21.98391420911528%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
20%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
