Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4333 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 19% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6200 - 151 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$861.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$861.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |