Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3865 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 37% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 213 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$728.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$728.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |