Buy on Amazon
CA$998.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2791 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 123 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 20 vs 6 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$998.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$998.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
