Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 138 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
