Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 875 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 6% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6200 - 206 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
