Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2597 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than FX-6200 - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 15 vs 125 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 3 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
