Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8120 is 1062 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 20 vs 8 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |