Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - CA$98.43 vs CA$599.06
- Up to 75% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-14700KF - CA$1.11 vs CA$4.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 136 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 28 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
89
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.4/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$599.06
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$599.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |