Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2645 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - CA$98.43 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9600KF - CA$1.11 vs CA$2.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 110 vs 89 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
89
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$249
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |