Buy on Amazon
CA$120.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $423
Availability
MSRP in USD: $423
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2185 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than FX-4350 - 217 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
206
94.93087557603687%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor FX-Series FX4350 FX-4350 FX 4350 4.2 GHz 125W Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4350FRW4KHK Socket AM3+ Good Performance, high Efficiency, Clear Picture
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
