Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 448 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than FX-4350 - 53 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
