Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 147 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1620 - 179 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
174
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
