Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2823 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 63% better in Diablo IV than FX-6200 - 145 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
