Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 965M outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 965M is 520 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 530 vs 509 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
509
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$177.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$177.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
53%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |