Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms GeForce GTX 965M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 2476 days newer than GeForce GTX 965M.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than GeForce GTX 965M - 101 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M - 4 vs 2 GB
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
101
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |