Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 572 vs 509 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - CA$179.99 vs CA$212.23
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
509
88.98601398601399%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$212.23
84%
Buy for CA$212.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77761 minutes ago
Buy for CA$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
36.5990990990991%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41.83826683826684%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |