Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GTX 965M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1208 days newer than GeForce GTX 965M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTX 965M - 39 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
39
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
69.06906906906907%
Texel Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
78.93607893607893%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
935 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1150 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |