Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 290X is 2373 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 50 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290X
- Performs up to 27% better in Forza Horizon 5 than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 14 vs 11 FPS
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $549 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |