Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2316 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 47% better in Halo Infinite than Radeon R7 250E - 47 vs 32 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
26.936026936026934%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
26.936026936026934%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
