Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 280X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2389 days newer than Radeon R9 280X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than Radeon R9 280X - 149 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 50 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
74%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
