Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2186 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 50 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 54 vs 52 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
53%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |