Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4173 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 348 vs 298 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
348
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$417.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |