Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 69% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 306 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
306
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$744.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |