Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12400 - 193 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $143.57 vs $416.96
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.82 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
38%
Price, $
$416.96
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $416.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6481 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
176
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6482 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |