Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 47% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 658 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
658
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |